|
Working
in the Mackenzie River poses many problems. Pat Williams, Manager Marine
Engineering, Western Arctic, for NTCL, says, "there's a lot of
shallow water. In dry years it can be really difficult, not only does
the depth decrease but the channels narrow as well. Coast Guard does a
good job with Aids to Navigation, marking the channel, but no one does
any dredging." And the river level can vary substantially in a
given year. "I've seen it fluctuate 8 ft. in a week," says
Williams. Another problem is rocks and ice going through the propellers
and rudders.
Going
up- or down-river each present their own problems. Typically the tugs
push, from the middle aft barge, two rows of three barges abeam. Because
the Mackenzie flows so fast, including parts where the current averages
5 to 6 knots, going downstream is not taxing on the engines, but is a
challenge for keeping the barges in the channel. There are also about
four areas, where the rapids are fast enough that the tows have to be
broken up before can proceed though them. Going upstream can be
difficult because more horsepower is required; although going against
the current slows things down, allowing the tows to consist of up to 4
rows of three barges across.
Williams
provides an example of the difficult areas. "There's a rock shelf
in the river just before Fort Good Hope, called the 'Ramparts'. In dry
years the boats have to actually push the barges uphill. You can see the
angle they make as they go over." This led to one observation on
the differences between open propellers and ones in nozzles. He reports
that, "Only the nozzle boats could push the bigger barges
through."
|
|
The
second observation was on the maintenance of the rudders. Behind the
open propellers, the rudders are, states Williams, "very high
maintenance because of vibration. The linkages and pins needed replacing
every two years. They are also susceptible to being knocked off, both
from the props spitting ice through and by backing too close to the
river banks. We noticed the rudders on the Kelly O. have only needed the
pins changed once in 30 years."
The
refit was undertaken because says Williams, "the hulls are fine and
the design works well but [engine] parts are starting to be a bit of an
issue. We also wanted to upgrade the capacity to save time." He
adds, "It looks like the [Mackenzie Valley] pipeline is coming, and
we are getting ready." So besides all four CAT D399 V16 engines
(1,125 hp at 1,225 rpm) being replaced with CAT 3512B Electronic engines
(1,410 hp at 1,600 rpm) and the 56-in. open propellers along with each's
twin rudders replaced by 58-in. integrated Nautican Nozzles and Triple
Rudders, new custom Lufkin transmissions and a Jastram twin-independent
steering system were installed.
One
reason Nautican's nozzles were used was NTCL was happy with the improved
performance that resulted after the retrofit of Nautican Nozzles to
their three arctic class vessels. Additionally, Williams reports that,
"the nozzles take a beating because they bounce off the bottom and
rocks get spat through. And they've stood up well though that." Joe
Gruzling, President of Nautican Research and Development Ltd., agrees,
"it looks like they stand up very well to the bouncing on the
bottom." He says this is, "due to their solid construction
with no plug welds."
For
shallow water operation the boats have tunnels to be able to use larger
diameter propellers. Following the tunnel contour longitudinally aft
along the hull bottom, the surface of the tunnel actually rises to above
the waterline where the propeller located before descending again to
below the waterline to prevent the propellers from sucking in air.
Gruzling suggests the tunnels produce, "lots of performance losses,
especially in shallow water," because the props are limited where
they can pull water in from.
As
well for shallow river operation, the Kelly Ovayuak and Jock McNiven's
Kort nozzles are not the standard 19A profile, but the type 22 profile.
According to Gruzling, the type 22 is similar in profile to the type 19,
but with a larger length to diameter ratio. The result is,
"slightly better bollard pull, but much greater drag and therefore
worse performance at higher speeds proportional to the length."
Gruzling had to adapt his Nautican Nozzles for the shallow water
operation as well. "The bottom of the nozzle is flattened and a
large segment of the nozzle is buried in the tunnel."
This
installation is the first shallow draft application of the Nautican
Triple Rudders and the first time that Nautican has supplied the nozzles
and Triple Rudders integrated as one unit. Gruzling explains, "The
nozzles are built with a head-box that housed the rudders together with
the rudder stock, bearings, links and seals. The rudders are mounted on
a removable cover plate to have access for replacing propeller. The idea
is it saves a lot of shipyard installation time." Williams agrees,
"It was a very easy installation and definitely saved time."
Chris
Mulder, Senior Project Engineer at RAL, supervised the bollard pull
trials on the Hay River. The accompanying figure shows that not only do
the larger engines produce more thrust as expected, from 60,000 lbs to
over 100,000 lbs, but the Nautican Nozzles produce more thrust at the
same horsepower, almost 60% over the open propeller and 10% over the
Kort nozzle at 4,400 hp. However the data from this test is not
complete.
Mulder
explains that as there is no one mooring strong enough and close enough
to deep water to take the 100,000 lb pull, a large barge with a strong
enough bollard was tied off to several points on shore to act as the
'immovable object'. The Edgar Kotokak was positioned about 300 ft. away
at a 45E angle to shore to both be in deep water and line up with the
barge. He reports that it was a bit tricky keeping the tug and barge
lined up in the current. The next problem was the tug's prop wash being
so large as to start backing up the river, creating all sorts of weird
eddies, one of which set another barge on the opposite bank free,
temporarily halting the tests. After restarting, the mooring lines of
the large barge began to break, stopping the tests altogether including
ones for measuring the astern bollard pull. Gruzling thinks these latter
tests would have shown an even better performance comparison for the
Nautican Nozzles.
Captain
Whittaker reports that you can see the difference the nozzles make.
"With the open wheel, the boat had a rooster tail. Now [the
nozzles] are putting the power in the water. We've added two knots to
the top end speed, we get 14 knots now. The Kelly O. and McNiven are
lucky to get 12." He also says that, "even with the bigger
engines, its more fuel efficient." He has one example, "On an
1100 mile trip we saved a day and a half in time and a day and a half of
fuel which adds up to three days of fuel."
Williams
is taking a more cautious approach in deciding whether the tug is more
efficient, preferring to wait until he has all the numbers at the end of
the year. But he does admit the tug's, "utilization is already
higher." Gruzling estimates that, "the NautiCAN Nozzles should
be 10-15% more efficient at towing speed than the Kort Nozzles and I
think the engines are 5-10% more fuel efficient. But great savings will
also come from the Triple rudders, from not having to reverse the
engines on one side when turning around the bends on the river."
The
much improved maneuverability is a surprising bonus for NTCL. Williams
explains why its so important and what happened. "When going down
river the tow needs to get split up at four spots to go through rapids.
To split up the tow, they have to stop and tie off some of the barges
and to do that, they have to turn 180E upstream first. All the other
boats, including the McNiven and Kelly O., will start setting up to spin
the tow .5 to .25 mile before the tie-up depending on the tow and
current conditions at the location. With the Triple rudders [the tug and
tow] turn right now. The first time they were operating the boat, one
crew went to turn a quarter mile before the tie-up, and they finished
turning a quarter mile before the tie-up."
Whittaker
has had similar experiences, "She turns on a dime. It can stop 6000
tons of freight, turn in its own length, all going down stream. And this
is when there are two rows of three barges, so its 700-ft. long by
165-ft. wide. With the split rudders I put one ahead with the rudders
hard over and the other astern with the rudders amidships. Half way
around at 90 degrees I put the one going astern into neutral, otherwise
we get dragged away backwards from our target."
So
it appears a high efficiency nozzle, in this case a Nautican one, offers
huge performance improvements of up to 60% over open propellers, and a
substantial improvement of 10% or more over the usual Kort Nozzles, even
in a challenging river application. As Mulder puts it, "It's a
no-brainer from a performance point of view to put nozzles on these very
shallow draft vessels." The nozzles and Triple Rudders have also
greatly helped the boat in the difficult river environments because now,
as Whittaker puts it, "she handles well."
|